They Are Closing The Library. We Are Guarding The Wrong Door.
While we hunt the machine in each other’s sentences, it is emptying humanity from the archive.

TL;DR
- AI detection tools are prone to false positives, misidentifying human writing as machine-generated, disproportionately affecting non-native speakers and neurodivergent individuals.
- The demand for AI detection distracts from the larger issue of AI companies destructively scanning millions of books, erasing physical copies and their provenance.
- This destructive scanning process, legally justified by replacing physical copies with digital ones, results in a loss of cultural context, historical connection, and authorial lineage.
- The art world's experience with provenance offers a model for preserving value through documentation, contrasting with the book industry's destruction of objects to avoid liability.
- The author argues for a shift from AI detection to tracing lineage and context within the work itself, advocating for a new form of 'librarianship' that values provenance and testimony over algorithmic judgment.