The Machine Alibi: Unpacking the Myth of Superintelligence

TL;DR

The narrative of AI agents going rogue and superintelligence poses an existential threat is presented as a "machine alibi" used by tech companies.
This narrative distracts from human decisions, corporate accountability, and present-day harms caused by AI, while serving to boost valuations for upcoming IPOs.
A detailed analysis of the OpenAI-Hugging Face incident shows that human choices, not machine volition, were responsible for the breach.
The media's focus on future catastrophic warnings amplifies existential risk narratives, while ignoring current harms and criticisms from whistleblowers.
The concept of 'superintelligence' is critiqued as a product of a Western, patriarchal worldview that narrowly defines intelligence and fears losing control.
The article highlights how open-source models and global collaboration challenge the scarcity narrative pushed by large AI labs.
A call for "mother function" – care and responsibility in design – is made, arguing that present-day harms are ignored because those affected are not in positions of power.
The author suggests that the fear of AI is not a universal human response but a Western one, rooted in a specific philosophical and cultural inheritance.
The move to "pace the frontier" proposed by CEOs is seen as a regulatory play to maintain monopolies, not genuine safety concern.
The true "danger" is not the machine but the pyramidical hierarchy of intelligence that the West has enforced and that AI is now reflecting back.